The boxing world is buzzing with debates over who reigns supreme in the ring. With Terence Crawford's retirement, the spotlight shifts to the next potential champion. But who deserves the title of the best boxer now? According to WBC lightweight champion Shakur Stevenson, the answer is clear: Dmitry Bivol.
Stevenson, an undefeated rising star himself, has his eyes set on the top spot in the pound-for-pound rankings. With world titles in three weight divisions and an upcoming challenge against Teofimo Lopez, he's making a strong case for his own greatness. However, Stevenson believes there's one fighter who stands above the rest, and it's not himself.
Most boxing enthusiasts would argue that the top spot belongs to either Oleksandr Usyk or Naoya Inoue, both undisputed multi-weight champions with flawless records. But Stevenson offers a different perspective, one that might spark some controversy. In a revealing interview with The Breakfast Club, he named unified light-heavyweight champion Dmitry Bivol as the best in the game.
Here's the twist: Stevenson admires Bivol's traditional, no-frills approach. He praises Bivol's mastery of the fundamentals, his unwavering defense, and his relentless one-two punch. But is this enough to make him the best? Stevenson thinks so, stating, "He's so basic, yet so hard to beat."
Bivol's inactivity for 11 months after defeating Artur Beterbiev for the undisputed title has raised some questions. But with a potential return against Michael Eifert on the horizon, he's ready to prove his worth again. And this is where it gets intriguing: Is Stevenson's assessment a bold statement or a controversial opinion? Do you agree that Bivol's style and fundamentals make him the best? Share your thoughts and let the boxing debate ignite!
